Go to Top

News: UK Supreme Court hears evidence of parliament suspension

The British Supreme Court heard evidence that the government had violated the law by suspending parliament until October 14.

Currently, the panel of judges is on the second day of the three-day hearing, trying to decide, firstly, whether the transfer of parliament is a matter considered by the courts, and secondly, whether it is illegal.

On Wednesday afternoon, the court heard Aidan O'Neill, who represents Joanna Cherry of the Scottish National Party and her group of deputies, who appealed against Johnson's decision. On September 11, Scottish judges agreed that blocking parliament by Boris Johnson was illegal.

This decision has been appealed by the government and is currently being heard by 11 of the 12 highest-ranking judges in the UK.

In a speech based on references to British history, literature, and poetry, O'Neill noted that the statue outside the building belonged to Oliver Cromwell, who suspended parliament “when he got tired of it.”

He quoted Abraham Lincoln, Rudyard Kipling and referenced Macbeth and Robert Burns Shakespeare, as well as the Norman Conquest of 1066 and the 1966 World Cup.

Earlier, Sir James Idi made remarks on how the rule of law governs this matter. Sir James argued with the government about why the delay was legal.

Go argued that prolocation was a political mechanism and should be judged by politicians, not judges. He said parliament had the opportunity to pass laws against deferment when he met last week, but decided not to.

Sir James gave three examples of how the Prime Minister extended the term of parliament, which was completely legal in 1914, 1930 and 1948.

Lord Wilson, one of the 11 Supreme Court judges who decided the case, asked Sir James if there was anyone who could better judge whether parliamentary transfer is illegal than they are.

Lord Sales asked Sir James if it would be better for the Supreme Court to make constitutional decisions?

Sir James replied that constitutional protection exists in the political arena, not in the courts.

It was suggested that by suspending the parliament, the government made it impossible for deputies to carry out their functions. But Sir James said the parliament had time to pass laws against suspension — just as he passed laws against the futile Brexit in Benn's law — but he decided not to.

Submissions from the governments of Scotland and Wales and former Prime Minister John Major will also be presented - all of which support challenges to the government. Arab sex movie نيك on sexjk.com